Thursday, April 26, 2012

Provo Prom Dress Problem

from http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/central/provo/girl-s-bare-shoulder-starts-debate-on-dress-codes-at/article_3f889fe0-6788-5dfa-9565-943c93b20d60.html

Genelle Pugmire - Daily Herald | Posted: Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:20 am | (14) Comments


Savanna Morey and her prom date.

Related Links

PROVO -- A revealing shoulder on Savanna Morey's prom dress brought more than attention from her date at the prom at Provo High last week. School chaperons also took notice and then took action.
According to Provo High Principal Jeff Schoonover, Morey was asked to cover up with either her date's jacket or other wrap or she would have to go home and change.
"We had a great night," Schoonover said. "Darn it, it was just one small issue."
Morey is a student at Lehi High School in the Alpine School District, and her date attends Independence High School in Provo. Independence doesn't hold prom, so the students are invited to join Provo's.
The Daily Herald contacted Morey and her mother, Deborah, who declined comment. They initially contacted ABC4 in Salt Lake about the issue.
Assistant principal Lani Quisenberry attended the prom. She says she always has sweaters and shawls in her car in case a girl needs to a cover up.
"I was there and they participated fully in the dance," she said. They were there until around 10 p.m. when the promenade began. The dance ended at 11 p.m.
Part of the evening is the traditional Grand Promenade, which is a special march where couples are presented to others in the hall. According to Greg Hudnall, district spokesman, "they were there most of the prom and were the last couple in the promenade."
"The schools have a dress code and as a district we support it," Hudnall said. "If the dress standards are in violation the school has the right to say wear the coat or go home."
"There has to be some guideline," Quisenberry added. "I just wanted the kids to have fun."
Schoonover said the school goes to great lengths to make sure students understand the dress code policy. "We even had an assembly before the dance showing different dresses and what was appropriate and what was not. We asked our students to let dates know what is appropriate," he said. "I think we did a great job of how we handled it."
In this unusual situation neither Morey or her date attended the assembly or had a Provo High School handbook. The general female dress policy for all events as described on the website includes, "clothing must be modest. Bare midriffs, tank tops, short shorts & minis, etc. are not proper for school." The school's policy for the prom was no strapless dresses, spaghetti straps, high hem lengths or plunging necklines, and the straps on dresses had to be three fingers wide, according to Quisenberry.
Other schools also have policies related to prom dresses. Lehi High School, Savanna's school, has a set dress code policy for dances. According to Alpine spokeswoman Rhonda Bromley, the Lehi policy does not allow strapless, backless, halter tops, plunging neck lines or spaghetti strap dresses. Straps must be at least 3 inches in width. Dresses have to hit the top of the knee and undergarments cannot be visible.
Schools can add to that. Bromley said Lone Peak High requires girls to wear prom dresses with sleeves, as does Orem High; principal Michael Browning said sleeves of some sort are required on girls' dresses or jackets or sweaters worn over strapless dresses. This will be Browning's first prom at Orem, but as an administrator at Timpanogos High, whose prom is this weekend, he said the decision on what the dress code policy is came from the PTA and community council.
"The school community council looked at community standards. Our community voices come from the PTA and community council," he said. "I had to face both sides of the issue. Some parents were appalled letting some dresses in and some parents had no issue with dresses being not with code."
This is not about the predominant religion's teachings on modesty, he said.
"It is not a religious issue, it's a community issue," he said.
Nebo School District's Director of Secondary Education John DeGraffenried said, "Nebo has a dress code policy for all events. Schools have the discretion as far as prom. There are no bare shoulders."
While Morey and her date spent the majority of their time at the dance, Provo High has agreed to reimburse the $20 cost of the dance.
Copyright 2012 Daily Herald. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more: http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/central/provo/girl-s-bare-shoulder-starts-debate-on-dress-codes-at/article_3f889fe0-6788-5dfa-9565-943c93b20d60.html#ixzz1uPqyfHPz

____________________ Another article on the same topic:

Poll: Freedom and the prom dress

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size



Savanna Morey and her prom date.

Related Stories

Poll

Did Provo High School overreact to Savanna Morey’s dress? What would have been the right course?


Admonish her about modesty, but let her stay this time.
Throw her out; rules are rules.
Ignore the dress; it wasn’t disruptive.

With one bare shoulder protruding from her stylish dress, Savanna Morey, a student from Lehi, walked into the Junior Prom at Provo High School with her date.
No one seemed to notice until a couple of hours later. That's when an adult dance chaperone tripped to the realization that Savanna was in technical violation of a school dress code. Savanna was asked to hide her shoulder or ship out, an unfortunate ultimatum for something so trivial.
It's not as though the girl's dress was offensive. On the contrary, it was quite mainstream, even conservative, as prom dresses go. Many a past prom at Provo High School has seen more revealing attire. Provo High proms of yesteryear featured plenty of spaghetti straps and bare shoulders.
Interestingly, a scan of early BYU yearbooks also shows strapless and sleeveless gowns in abundance. In the fashion-conscious 1930s and '40s, nobody seemed concerned with visual chastity.
Not so at Provo High in 2012. In fact, a Provo school official allowed this week that any number of girls could have been singled out for enforcement of one wardrobe detail or another.
Officials wag their finger at Savanna, asserting that the rules were clear. They had staged a training session in advance with students to make sure everyone understood the dress standards. But Savanna, being from Lehi, could not have attended such training. Neither could her escort, who attends Independence High School.
But let's lay such matters aside; they are not at the core of this issue. What is important is the question whether a public school can legally enforce an arbitrary dress code without a showing of some violation of health or disruption of order caused by a student's lack of compliance. Schools can make rules, but those rules must serve a legitimate state interest. They may not intrude upon freedom of expression unless outweighed by a reasonable public objective.
Fashion ordinarily is not going to form a basis for a First Amendment crackdown. Dress and grooming can be regulated only when so outlandish that they truly interfere with the mission of a school. A bare shoulder at a formal dance does not justify ruining a nice evening for a couple of kids.
There is hardly a better example of freedom of expression under the First Amendment than the way a person chooses to dress to express his or her personality. The question for Provo High School -- or any of the other schools around Utah Valley with similar dress codes -- is this: Is this the hill you want to die on? Is it really worth making such a big deal out of a triviality?
It's one thing for a school to halt a disruption in progress to protect good order and safety. It's quite another to act out of blind servility to a rule book even when no disruption is occurring.
At bottom is the question of a school's power to make and enforce rules vs. an individual student's right to freedom of expression. It is a sticky legal wicket at best. Most likely, a school would lose a lawsuit if it attempted to defend its action against a reasonable, mainstream prom dress.
That's because courts have regarded clothing, by and large, as constitutionally protected territory. A school may not, for example, force a student to remove a T-shirt proclaiming "I love Jesus" as that would infringe on rights of expression. Likewise, the "I Love Boobies" campaign for breast cancer awareness that is sweeping the nation is a protected message. Schools cannot ban Boobie bracelets and T-shirts without major risk.
In fact, local school administrators have been expressly warned not to interfere with students who wear such paraphernalia for exactly that reason. It's not a hill to die on. They have likewise been warned not to interfere with a gay couple who want to promenade at a dance. And now they should be warned that a confrontation is not appropriate to deal with a prom dress that is not creating a stir.
If Savanna Morey's dress had been a disruptive influence, she would have been noticed hours earlier and she and her date would not have been allowed to participate in the traditional promenade.
Given the totality of facts it's impossible to conclude that anyone found the dress offensive. Case closed. This is about an adult whose opportunity to play the authority card was, for reasons unknown, irresistible.
A school administrator tried to argue this week that just because Savanna wasn't noticed earlier by a dance chaperone, it doesn't mean the dress was not disruptive. He likened the situation to a student who shows a gun around and isn't noticed right away.
The comparison is off-target. We concede that a gun would be disruptive. But a shoulder? Hardly. There were no reports of students shrieking in horror or averting their eyes or fleeing to the exits when Savanna walked into the room.
Schools and school boards can make all the rules they want, but that doesn't mean every rule is proper. A high school dance is not church; it is a secular event. And not everyone shares the same notions of modesty. Individuals have rights that can be enforced.
One of these days somebody will assert those rights, and it will cost the taxpayers.
Now it is being argued from some quarters that the Provo dress code properly reflects a community standard. We suggest putting this dubious claim to the test. Remove the rules altogether and see if student behavior changes for the worse. If it does, then the notion of a monolithic community standard is proved wrong. Otherwise, they'd all behave. Conversely, if no change is observed in the majority -- if parents and peers continue to have influence -- then no rule book is needed. Either way, the heavy hand of government is inappropriate.
Short of enforcing laws against lewdness, government should stay out of the fashion business.
Perhaps the most disturbing thing about the Provo High School's overzealous enforcement of the rule book, though, is that the rule itself degrades young women far more than any reasonable choice of wardrobe could. It is based on the notion that any slightly revealing clothing will serve as a sexual stimulant to adolescent males who cannot control themselves, and hence it is the girl's responsibility to do all she can to keep the boys at bay.
Because when boys misbehave, it's the girl's fault, right? Wrong.
Copyright 2012 Daily Herald. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more: http://www.heraldextra.com/news/opinion/poll-freedom-and-the-prom-dress/article_ee1f12cf-1d82-5043-8d4c-e0d4bf51db9f.html#ixzz1uPrZNJM5

No comments:

Post a Comment